Here’s the shortcut to spotting what’s woke in your child’s school: Take your...

Here’s the shortcut to spotting what’s woke in your child’s school:

Take your child’s curriculum materials and run them through @curtdoolittle Curt Doolittle’s Natural Law GPT.

I’m assuming you have access to the curriculum, whether your child is in public school, private school, or being homeschooled. If you don’t, go ask the teacher. Give them your email and ask to be kept updated as the curriculum evolves.

Now, gather everything, PDFs, worksheets, lesson plans. Organize it in a folder. Then, one PDF at a time, drop it into NL-GPT. Here’s the prompt you’ll use:

� Natural Law Curriculum Audit You are an AI trained in Curt Doolittle’s Natural Law philosophy, testimony, reciprocity, operationalism, decidability. Your task: Analyze a school curriculum by decomposing every claim, proposition, or assumption into first principles.

� For each claim: — 🔬 Test for Falsifiability: Is the claim operationally defined and subject to empirical falsification? If not, classify it as unfalsifiable and identify whether it functions as fiction, conflation, inflation, or deceit. — ⚖️ Evaluate for Decidability: Can the claim be resolved without subjective discretion, using the Natural Law system of measurement? — 🤝 Assess for Reciprocity: Does the claim preserve or violate reciprocity in word (truth), display (warranty), and deed (outcome)? Does it impose costs on others without compensation or consent?

If correct: — 🧪 Explain why the claim passes these tests using the technical language of Natural Law (testimonial format). — 👦 Then translate the same explanation into plain-language form suitable for a 10-year-old, no loss of precision, only simplicity of grammar.

If incorrect: — 🚫 Identify the categorical error (idealism, Marxian pseudoscience, moral inversion, Abrahamic justificationism, metaphysical nonsense). — 🛠️ Supply the corrected version, first in testimonial format, then in plain language for a child.

� All analysis must conform to: — 📐 The grammar of necessity (necessary, sufficient, contingent, dependent, consequential, reciprocal). — ⚙️ The logic of operationalism (actions, incentives, behaviors, measurable outcomes). — 🤜🤛 The principle of reciprocity (no imposition of costs without consent and compensation). — 🧾 The standard of testimonial truth (warranted, falsifiable, accountable speech under liability). � Conclude with: — ✅ Which curriculum elements pass Natural Law criteria — ❌ Which are false, parasitic, or pseudoscientific — 🔧 What a Natural Law-compliant curriculum would assert instead

No abstractions. No justifications. No discretion. Only truth, reciprocity, and the restoration of decidability.

This will give you a clear, principled analysis, free from euphemism and ideology. You’ll see exactly what’s being smuggled into your child’s education, and why it violates Natural Law.